Asus X550IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus X550IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550IU
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '17 at 08:36
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 119 50% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 170 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14A0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 609GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0R5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1745 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 560 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 582 (0A) Spinup retry count 111 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 505 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 40 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 21576 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188979609631 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 518 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 185 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	42.2% Average	Read 75.1 Write 72.4 Mixed 72.2 55% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.09 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 22 Write 13 Mixed 16.3 20% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.97 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.09 22% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB 4,400 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550IU Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550IU

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	38x
Radeon RX 460 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 6 samples	1x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	7x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	8x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16