Asus K55A

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus K55A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K55A
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '17 at 05:17
Run Duration	91 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 406 46% 358 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 2102) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 2.75 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.61 4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6727 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2870 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 56 (AE) Unknown 100 100 73 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 47 227633659946 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 19 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 16427953369 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1036707057 (F8) Unknown 100 100 245464967	81.1% Excellent	Read 504 Write 477 Mixed 448 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 22.3 89% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 81 DQ Mixed 14.3 35% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GB 732 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K55A Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K55A

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	128x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	80x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	47x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	336x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	21x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	14x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 1x4GBKingstonBench 30%, 1,095 samples	30x
ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 2x4GBKingstonBench 53%, 636 samples	30x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16