HP p6-2014

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2014  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 00:51
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3600 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 60.9
35% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 115
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.6% Below average
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 101
29% 65 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 73.6
57% 68.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.2% Good
Read 266
Write 209
Mixed 219
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 30.2
107% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 88.8
83% 130 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
638GB free
Firmware: JA2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 88.8
Write 82.9
Mixed 81.4
64% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.21
74% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 20.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 86.3
Write 79.9
Mixed 84.7
63% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.55
140% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
226GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 122
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.22
61% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
80GB free
Firmware: AX00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 81.2
Write 80.2
Mixed 71.9
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
120GB free
Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 77.8
Mixed 95.4
71% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.36
84% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2014 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2014

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback