Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-A (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 15:58
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) 11,026 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 66 2-Core 118 54% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 179 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.8 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 20.9 19% 20.8 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 17.5 18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17380 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1676 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 203 (AE) Unknown 100 100 75 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1990 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 51 210453397531 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 20689581778 (F7) Unknown 100 100 442700995 (F8) Unknown 100 100 950216448	65.9% Good	Read 477 Write 134 Mixed 207 59% 273 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 25.5 107% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 40.7 58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 277GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 97 7 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 75 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896633012 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5643 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17319 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1668 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5795 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5795 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 197568757791 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6	88.4% Excellent	Read 149 Write 159 Mixed 150 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.22 94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 103%
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39 2,756 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 233GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2810 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 10697 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21438 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6204 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 83 1 286195729 (C2) HDA temperature 79 60 353304597 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2326 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 20 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	53.5% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 94.2 Mixed 90.6 70% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.48 120% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 16GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 18.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	53x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	39x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	38x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	31x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	31x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	22x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	12x
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 719 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16