HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110311
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 10:53
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 59 2-Core 120 54% 87.1 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 364 33% 279 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6003 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 962 (B1) Unknown 94 94 110 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 85 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33337599262	35.8% Below average	Read 174 Write 158 Mixed 148 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 13.2 59% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 16.1 DQ Write 49.6 DQ Mixed 10.2 14% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 115%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 83GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 141 5241 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5355 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9656 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1486 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 206 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5387 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.7% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 52.4 Mixed 55.7 41% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 50GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16