Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111020
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 10:29
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 95.3 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 162 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 415 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 32 21% 27.3 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 25.5 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Goodram C100 120GB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM07.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7129 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2862 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 4294967620 (AD) Unknown 100 100 11272462 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 214 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 94 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8784	41% Average	Read 157 Write 225 Mixed 181 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 10 67% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 11.3 15% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 79%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 844GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 199 191 9008 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2703 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7065 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2401 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 339 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24238 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 180 13218 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.1% Very good	Read 133 Write 128 Mixed 125 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.19 94% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 97%
WD WD20NPVX-00EA4T0 2TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 7GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 216 212 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1855 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5361 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1760 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 128 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9329 (C2) HDA temperature 118 99 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	36.4% Below average	Read 64.3 Write 62.1 Mixed 63 48% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.15 60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 4 229 (03) Spinup time 71 71 9400 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 6601 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10610 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29399 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6006 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 2 159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 264 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 25383 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 30 370081814 (C2) HDA temperature 71 21 1241733070877 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 298348 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 59 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 111 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	22.4% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 39.5 Mixed 41.8 30% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.22 52% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 58%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 33 Write 27.6 Mixed 28.1 37% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.17 4K Write 7.25 4K Mixed 2.57 357% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 11.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.2 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	373x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16