Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 00:13
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 68.9 2-Core 131 59% 94.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 331 33% 269 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 74.1 Reflection 74.3 Parallax 64.3 60% 70.9 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 65.7 55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB 3,209 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6542 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 772 (A2) Unknown 100 100 307 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1835067 (AE) Unknown 100 100 134 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 134 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 408723284 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4966 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5086	45.2% Average	Read 388 Write 206 Mixed 104 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 6.41 55% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 48.5 DQ Mixed 6.21 13% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,774 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 315GB free, PID a208 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 34.3 Mixed 14.1 34% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	13x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	11x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16