Asus P5K-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K-V (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 4.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080618
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '17 at 23:32
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 66.6 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 85.1 42% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 84.4 8-Core 85 11% 84.7 Pts	64-Core 84.7 5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 34E2) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.98% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 2.78 6% 5.65 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 4.67 Splatting 3.96 4% 5.11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.98% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: FH100-05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4480 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10891 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17643 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5653 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 3367565 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2429994 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 154 88 839581724 (C2) HDA temperature 145 88 839581727 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3367565 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 7 (C5) Current pending sector count 89 89 103 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 95 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	54.8% Above average	Read 94.3 Write 96.7 Mixed 56.5 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.39 95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 512, 1024, 1024 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K-V Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-V

CPU
Xeon X5470IntelBench 54%, 1,638 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	1x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x
SVP100S296G 96GBKingstonBench 64%, 7 samples	1x
S511 120GBAdataBench 68%, 604 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16