HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1671
Memory5.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '17 at 22:14
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 6.2
2-Core 10.7
4% 8.45 Pts
4-Core 15.1
8-Core 20.8
2% 18 Pts
64-Core 21.8
1% 21.8 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1671) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.53
0% 0.49 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$10
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS001C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 63
Mixed 63.3
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.25
61% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 10GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 754
5% 754 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback