Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '17 at 17:01
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 219 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 1,012 89% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,405 87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3113 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.9 27% 33.9 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 42.7 34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 238GB free Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21942 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8252 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 91 91 276 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2438 (B5) Unknown 100 100 32607503062789 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 582 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 14 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 91 91 9 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	54.6% Above average	Read 487 Write 266 Mixed 348 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 5.64 49% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 5.71 34% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 74%
Toshiba Q300 960GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3237 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1530 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 767 (C2) HDA temperature 65 30 300648628259	49.9% Average	Read 490 Write 188 Mixed 82.4 55% 253 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 6.86 44% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 80.3 DQ Mixed 34.3 53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 90%
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 175GB free Firmware: 2.50 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 18385646 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 63221918615757 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6418 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 4256 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18385646 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18385646 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18385646 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 31666 (EA) Unknown 0 0 36977 (F1) Unknown 0 0 36977 (F2) Unknown 0 0 49757	32% Below average	Read 231 Write 128 Mixed 190 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 10.4 38% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 31.5 35% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 4x8GB 734 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	MC Read 55.8 MC Write 62.9 MC Mixed 48.8 160% 55.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 18.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	297x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	180x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	62x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16