Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '17 at 12:13
Run Duration	918 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 242 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 689 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 699 43% 699 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 200B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB 3,654 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2317002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 2 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 64 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 21 (A9) Unknown 100 100 155 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 17 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 100 240518168619 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 39 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 850 (F1) Unknown 253 253 448 (F2) Unknown 253 253 489	61.8% Good	Read 495 Write 174 Mixed 255 67% 308 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 3.68 87% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 24.7 59% 123 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 524GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698549 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 91 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 144 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 62 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 147 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 147 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 163210133535 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81.6% Excellent	Read 156 Write 128 Mixed 154 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 2TB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2TB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Read 20.1 Write 4.02 Mixed 4.28 9% 9.46 MB/s	4K Read 3.84 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.001 14% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 5.73 Mixed 8.49 13% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.04 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.009 34% 3.02 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 8%
Generic- Multiple Reader 1GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Read 6.3 Write 2.12 Mixed 1.84 4% 3.42 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 11 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	905x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	724x
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	450x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	296x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	235x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	145x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	170x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16