| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M3N78-VM (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100910 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 21 '17 at 22:29 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
54% 83.7 Pts
|
29% 219 Pts
|
14% 220 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 227B) 1GB
CLim: 1105 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.9.3
|
22.4%
Poor
|
22% 29.8 fps
|
23% 27.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
40% 181 MB/s
|
89% 30.4 MB/s
|
19% 31.5 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
28.2%
Poor
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
58% 69.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M3N78-VM Builds (Compare 36 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M3N78-VM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 3x |
| Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,005 samples | 5x |
| Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 4x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $83 |