Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110830
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '17 at 12:58
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 215 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 559 58% 468 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.5% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 30 Parallax 35.7 26% 32.8 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 32.8 32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata S510 120GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 15GB free Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 61727269990536 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2548 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 1 (AE) Unknown 0 0 61 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 45 42952622107 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14264 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16306 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16306 (F2) Unknown 0 0 21194	38.7% Below average	Read 151 Write 96.1 Mixed 106 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 10.6 85% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 88.6 DQ Mixed 11 22% 42 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3367 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 429 (B1) Unknown 98 98 83 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 56 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18445143487	63.7% Good	Read 421 Write 170 Mixed 222 59% 271 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 20.3 114% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 21.6 30% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 124%
LaCie P9223 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 601GB free, PID 1070 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 28 Mixed 30.2 38% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.4 40% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 27GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 28.3 Mixed 9.68 27% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.23 56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 43%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 32GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 10.6 Mixed 10.5 16% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.25 31% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	60.6% Good	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - $170

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	43x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 10,150 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $725

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16