Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	31.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '17 at 01:17
Run Duration	647 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 191 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 602 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 780 48% 780 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3202) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 48.6 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 40.9 40% 45.1 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 37.1 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 553GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 705 Write 527 Mixed 558 133% 597 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 28.3 100% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 20.9 76% 167 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 302%
Lexar WorkflowCR1 256GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 231GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 384 Write 258 Mixed 300 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 3.28 46% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 3.33 10% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 210GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20480 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1898 (B1) Unknown 98 98 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 63 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27490497217	88.6% Excellent	Read 505 Write 408 Mixed 420 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 31.1 105% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 110 120% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 23GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 18268661 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -5823975634007 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1902 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 560 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 44 64427393054 (C2) HDA temperature 30 44 64427393054 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18268661 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18268661 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18268661 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1849 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1408 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1408 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2141	57% Above average	Read 474 Write 177 Mixed 273 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 15.8 71% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 44.3 58% 104 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 85%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71% Very good	Read 177 Write 183 Mixed 137 211% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.24 69% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 71%
NORELSYS 106X 2TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 129 Write 135 Mixed 84.1 146% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 80%
TOSHIBA HDWE160 6TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 187 Write 178 Mixed 113 197% 159 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.29 140% 5.39 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 77%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 138 Write 136 Mixed 128 172% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 61%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 867GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 105 Write 65.2 Mixed 71.1 96% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 6.57 4K Mixed 0.43 240% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 84%
WDC WD10 EZEX-75M2NA0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 436GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 105 Write 61.8 Mixed 38.8 77% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.14 14% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 51%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 76GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 93 Write 102 Mixed 90.5 124% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 59GB free, PID null Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 117 Write 122 Mixed 104 147% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.32 63% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 71%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 37GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 36 Write 39.5 Mixed 17.9 39% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.32 94% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 29GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 20.4 Write 5.43 Mixed 8.71 12% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.59 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 1.37 147% 2.81 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 19%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 81.5 Write 79.5 Mixed 74.9 101% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 6x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 6 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.9% Excellent	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 32.2 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 19.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	426x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16