Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '17 at 00:57
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 485
64% 481 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3745) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 166
Parallax 156
123% 158 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 150
Splatting 119
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 472
Mixed 391
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 37.9
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 143
148% 243 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
41GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 445
Write 84
Mixed 104
45% 211 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 14.3
88% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 75.1
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 27.6
39% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 75%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
241GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 72.7
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 3.15
4K Mixed 0.59
157% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
115GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 53.1
Mixed 52.7
41% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 58%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
64GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 66.4
Mixed 49.8
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.27
82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 24
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 47.6
84% 47.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback