Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '17 at 20:27
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 272
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 779
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.9.3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 63.2
41% 48.8 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 41.1
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 431
Write 275
Mixed 321
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 17.5
128% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 16.8
30% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
232GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 149
Mixed 144
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.32
114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
118GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 76.3
Write 79.3
Mixed 64.5
94% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 65%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
8GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 42.6
Write 7.72
Mixed 8.63
18% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.03
49% 4.35 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback