| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar H61MLV (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120223 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '17 at 14:36 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.2%
Above average
|
58% 94.9 Pts
|
18% 133 Pts
|
8% 134 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Nvidia(10DE 058F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
4.9%
Terrible
|
5% 5.5 fps
|
5% 6.35 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
34% 46.7 MB/s
|
113% 1 MB/s
| |
|
|
54.5%
Above average
|
50% 68.6 MB/s
|
79% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
23.7%
Poor
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MLV Builds (Compare 129 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 21x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 21x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |