Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 11:33
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 202 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 389 51% 384 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 2290) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 49.4 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 58.7 40% 51.7 fps	MRender 52.5 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 65.3 46% 54.8 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 16895591 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 120379343384417 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2229 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 141 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 39 55837130779 (C2) HDA temperature 27 39 55837130779 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16895591 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16895591 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16895591 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11233 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8583 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8583 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5749	33.1% Below average	Read 172 Write 52.6 Mixed 70.1 21% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 10.2 74% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 53 DQ Mixed 9.3 16% 29 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 178 5841 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1110 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10756 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 158 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 146 146 162542 (C2) HDA temperature 121 113 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 126 Mixed 117 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.3 112% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 84%
WD WD75 00AARS-00Y5B 750GB 3,011 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 210GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 186 6450 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2535 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15441 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2185 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 331 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 33 33 502817 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42% Average	Read 69.5 Write 76.6 Mixed 71.4 55% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.23 75% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.4% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 20.2 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	184x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	93x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	41x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16