Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 05:10
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 139 2-Core 204 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 937 86% 722 Pts	64-Core 1,376 85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 72.4 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 64.4 59% 70.7 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 73.5 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 874GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21613 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1922 (B1) Unknown 94 94 66 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 43 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1246 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62803982630	75.5% Very good	Read 504 Write 346 Mixed 358 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 19.8 113% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 26.4 DQ Mixed 10.9 12% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 126%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 180GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 425 Write 239 Mixed 288 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 2.07 41% 9.55 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 185GB free Firmware: 9401 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 100 Mixed 78.4 70% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 4.44 4K Mixed 0.67 175% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4TB free, PID 0110 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79% Very good	Read 190 Write 184 Mixed 136 214% 170 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.27 155% 6.82 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 81%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3TB free, PID 0110 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 122 Write 92.7 Mixed 107 134% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.71 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.24 68% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 81%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 68.6 Write 62.9 Mixed 60.3 81% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.05 31% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 93.4 Write 91.5 Mixed 80.8 113% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.2 75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.9% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 19.4 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 11 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	104x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	23x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	73x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	47x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $840

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16