PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-A (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150424 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 19 '17 at 04:45 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
|||
84%
Excellent
|
||||
65.4%
Good
|
||||
44.2%
Average
|
||||
39.4%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 2,292x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 1,176x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 417x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 784x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 338x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 306x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $798 |