Asus M2V-TVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M2V-TVM (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060731
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 18:13
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 900 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 57.7 1-Core 9.9 2-Core 27.3 25% 31.6 Pts	4-Core 10.1 8-Core 22.6 2% 16.4 Pts	64-Core 24.4 2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 3.41 4% 4.2 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: BF100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4544 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7716 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7137 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5356 (B8) Unknown 99 99 660 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 917881 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 157 124 27 (C2) HDA temperature 148 121 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 411437 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	35.5% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 62.8 Mixed 35.4 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 42%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 866GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 26 Mixed 27.1 35% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16