Toshiba Satellite P50-A-K9M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite P50-A-K9M  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10ST
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 12:29
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 41.6
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 72.7
32% 52 Pts
4-Core 77.9
8-Core 106
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Toshiba(1179 FA49) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 8.94
6% 7.97 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 8.74
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM16 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 88
Write 84.9
Mixed 69.8
61% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.08
28% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73CB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback