| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS G31T-M9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090721 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 18 '17 at 10:26 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.5%
Below average
|
38% 57.3 Pts
|
10% 74.4 Pts
|
5% 75.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 4300
XFX(1682 2461) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
|
1.23%
Terrible
|
1% 2.07 fps
|
1% 1.33 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
40.2%
Average
|
43% 58.1 MB/s
|
24% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
12% 4.37 GB/s
|
7% 2.43 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G31T-M9 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS G31T-M9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $180 |