MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 03:09
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 231 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 838 78% 649 Pts	64-Core 1,252 78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 116 Parallax 105 93% 112 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 100 Splatting 92.7 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 87%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2762) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 36.8 27% 33.8 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 34.2 30% 37 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-488 240GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2875 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 778 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 46 (B1) Unknown 0 0 114 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 36198 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 98 (E7) Temperature 100 100 36 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1 (EA) Unknown 0 0 50 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7373 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4606	73.7% Very good	Read 509 Write 284 Mixed 365 85% 386 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 17.2 94% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 17.2 60% 131 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 992GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 241172344 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1578 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 72239955 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16231 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 761 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 98 524297 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 504954910 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 36 36 129032 (C2) HDA temperature 30 46 42949672990 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -73078868536567 (F1) Unknown 100 253 18475220627 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31947771999
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 320GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 15940888 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3874 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 413266811 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1098 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 15 (BD) vendor-specific 26 26 74 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 521732127 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 142 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 61085 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 4294967327 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -76471892689780 (F1) Unknown 100 253 61766358693 (F2) Unknown 100 253 76945850575	85.5% Excellent	Read 154 Write 144 Mixed 150 113% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.23 72% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 112%
USB Mass Storage Device 16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 168a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	6.24% Terrible	Read 20 Write 12 Mixed 10.9 17% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.94 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 12% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.24% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4 2x8GB 1,403 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 30.4 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 22.6 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	250x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	225x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	180x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16