Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Blade Stealth
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 00:05
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	89%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 61.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 78% 147 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 546 63% 493 Pts	64-Core 532 33% 532 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 6757) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.65% Terrible	Lighting 7.93 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 7.66 6% 9.09 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 16.1 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.65% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,895 Write 1,177 Mixed 1,272 320% 1,448 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 12.9 67% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 11.9 27% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GB 14,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.9% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.5 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 21 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	328x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	162x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	107x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	199x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	157x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	91x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	84x
CA3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 148%, 3,184 samples	49x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	48x

RAM
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	383x
MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GBSamsungBench 58%, 468 samples	65x
K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 5,177 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16