HP 550-180no

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 550-180no (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '17 at 08:21
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 193 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 348 50% 368 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.46 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 10.2 11% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 14.4 11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 3924 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 25 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1415 (AA) Unknown 100 100 319 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 71 (AE) Unknown 99 99 25 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	63.7% Good	Read 494 Write 67.3 Mixed 113 48% 225 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 18.5 103% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 68.5 DQ Mixed 44.2 77% 160 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 788GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 70 (03) Spinup time 127 100 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1413 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 100 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3897 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1413 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 11879 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 64 387579930 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9955 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9955 (C2) HDA temperature 230 166 154620264474 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.4% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 160 Mixed 157 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.19 81% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 9,029 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 550-180no

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)