HP EliteBook 2560p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 2560p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 162B
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '15 at 21:00
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 120
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 174
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 162B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 74
Write 170
Mixed 111
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 9.25
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 5.97
37% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 70.4
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 11.9
20% 39 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 51%
Wintec ExpressCard 96GB
54GB free
Firmware: 9090 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 66.6
Mixed 72.1
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 7.89
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 1.47
529% 3.79 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47
51GB free
Firmware: LV01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 31
Mixed 33.9
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.25
59% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2560p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $183
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback