| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H170M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150721 |
| Uptime | 35.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '17 at 10:24 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
83% 147 Pts
|
62% 503 Pts
|
39% 630 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
48% 58.7 fps
|
47% 58.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
75.2%
Very good
|
80% 364 MB/s
|
114% 46.5 MB/s
|
47% 95.7 MB/s
|
|
|
43.5%
Average
|
68% 88.4 MB/s
|
74% 0.84 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.7%
Good
|
69% 24.3 GB/s
|
51% 17.7 GB/s
|
60% 66.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,294 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 321x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 280x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 140x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 136x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 104x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 73x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $701 |