Asrock 890GM Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 890GM Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 18:52
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 82.9 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 90.7 49% 74 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 249 27% 212 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 4290 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 9714) 368MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.28 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 31 Parallax 38 36% 37.9 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 36 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 10605645 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -2138893703745 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2194 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1867 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10605645 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10605645 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10605645 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13847 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13803 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13803 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13498	30.4% Below average	Read 198 Write 102 Mixed 119 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 6.69 46% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 32.9 35% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 140GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 72112272 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1749 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 64349681 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7784 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1719 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 68 420872217 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 400 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 53 53 95601 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 64424509465 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 61722975015733 (F1) Unknown 100 253 25244996855 (F2) Unknown 100 253 30155814705	80.8% Excellent	Read 137 Write 145 Mixed 121 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 16GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 890GM Pro3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 890GM Pro3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x
Phenom II X6 1075TAMD $254Bench 56%, 4,420 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

SSD
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	2x
Vertex 3 240GBOCZ $80Bench 77%, 4,893 samples	1x
120GB SSD 120GB3Bench 60%, 3,381 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-151.A00LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 50%, 254 samples	1x
99U5471-001.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 654 samples	1x
CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 204 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16