HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	11.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 14:49
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 377 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% PowerColor(148C 2381) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 32.5 20% 29 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 24 Splatting 32.8 24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4321 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 460 (B1) Unknown 87 87 61 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 35 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 123 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10975259849	58.6% Above average	Read 486 Write 266 Mixed 273 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 11.7 74% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 11.7 15% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 692GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 66 218168383 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 95 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1475212 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (B7) Unknown 48 48 52 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 65 538312736 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 96 (C2) HDA temperature 32 15 64424509472 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 5 1 218168383 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -140247862083410 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1031558012 (F2) Unknown 100 253 945403255	68.7% Good	Read 127 Write 112 Mixed 111 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.3 107% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 640GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 155GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 21.9 Mixed 17.9 28% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.29 76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 21%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 8.46 Mixed 11.2 17% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.36 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.74 83% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF ACR256X64D3U1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 14GB 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,040x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	962x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	398x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	379x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	335x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	119x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16