Samsung R428/P428

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.54%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemSamsung R428/P428  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R428/P428
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 07:19
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$125
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
SC Int 28.7
SC Float 16.8
SC Mixed 21.3
18% 22.3 Pts
QC Int 49.3
QC Float 28.6
QC Mixed 35.9
9% 37.9 Pts
MC Int 57.2
MC Float 32.9
MC Mixed 42.4
7% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 25%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
149GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 37.6
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical R428/P428 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Samsung R428/P428

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $192SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback