| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141017 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '17 at 07:05 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
70% 118 Pts
|
44% 345 Pts
|
25% 410 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.4%
Poor
|
28% 29.6 fps
|
26% 32.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.9%
Above average
|
54% 253 MB/s
|
81% 32.5 MB/s
|
30% 62.5 MB/s
|
|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
60% 81.6 MB/s
|
69% 0.81 MB/s
| |
|
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
108% 144 MB/s
|
101% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.2%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 187x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 78x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 64x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 57x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $802 |