User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 days ago, 6 days ago.
SystemTriGem DREAMSYS
MotherboardECS HARRISON2
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 06:25
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.5% Good
SC Int 83.9
SC Float 88.9
SC Mixed 88.4
70% 87.1 Pts
QC Int 340
QC Float 350
QC Mixed 342
78% 344 Pts
MC Int 352
MC Float 336
MC Mixed 350
52% 346 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Zotac(19DA 5162) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 11.3
4% 12.4 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 7.1
5% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$45
486GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 137
Write 98.7
Mixed 81.8
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.25
52% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$20
29GB free
Firmware: 3.AAB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 25.4
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.27
69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
7GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 17.5
Mixed 22.9
28% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.44
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 1.16
126% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 8.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $54Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback