Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 06:19
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 505
68% 505 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 67
62% 74.1 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 72.2
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,086
297% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 20.8
147% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 19.7
35% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 187%
Great: 236%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
40GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 489
Write 200
Mixed 299
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 10.5
69% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 10.5
15% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 86
Mixed 77.9
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
302GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97
Write 93.6
Mixed 93.7
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.45
145% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
188GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.4
Write 84.6
Mixed 73.7
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.15
53% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49%
Great: 55%
WD 20EADS External 2TB
722GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.3
50% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.13
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback