Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
10 days ago, 10 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 06:19
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7600-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
SC Int 116
SC Float 131
SC Mixed 126
99% 124 Pts
QC Int 477
QC Float 505
QC Mixed 488
111% 490 Pts
MC Int 478
MC Float 507
MC Mixed 490
74% 492 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$260
MSI(1462 8C94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Lighting 227
Reflection 207
Parallax 214
69% 216 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 205
Splatting 166
74% 173 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$128
76GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,086
297% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 20.8
147% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 19.7
35% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 187%
Great: 270%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
40GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 489
Write 200
Mixed 299
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 10.5
69% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 10.5
15% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$109
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 86
Mixed 77.9
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 66%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$53
302GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97
Write 93.6
Mixed 93.7
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.45
145% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$66
188GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.4
Write 84.6
Mixed 73.7
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.15
53% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
WD 20EADS External 2TB
722GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.3
50% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.13
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $635
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $192SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback