Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 02:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$308
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
SC Int 140
SC Float 146
SC Mixed 143
114% 143 Pts
QC Int 356
QC Float 403
QC Mixed 383
86% 380 Pts
MC Int 354
MC Float 403
MC Mixed 383
57% 380 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$110
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 64.8
20% 58.3 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 38.7
24% 53.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$90
166GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 407
Mixed 422
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 50.6
191% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 119
141% 247 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$115
69GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 340
Mixed 343
87% 394 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 23.6
139% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 60.1
107% 214 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$45
469GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 186
Write 127
Mixed 143
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.27
98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $308Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $113
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback