User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemLG N450-P.BE55P1
MotherboardQuanta LG3
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 23:14
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-3210M-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
SC Int 71.3
SC Float 73.9
SC Mixed 69.9
57% 71.7 Pts
QC Int 162
QC Float 163
QC Mixed 177
38% 167 Pts
MC Int 186
MC Float 184
MC Mixed 190
28% 187 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1854 1809) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.8
3% 11.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 17.4
4% 11.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$35
360GB free
Firmware: AX001L Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 82.9
Write 85.1
Mixed 82
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown HB3SU004GFM8MMD16 Kingston 99U5417-027.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $189SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback