Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 22:45
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 107
53% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 248
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 64.4
59% 70 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 69.8
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 32GB
29GB free
Firmware: S5FAM017 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 202
Write 179
Mixed 164
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 8.81
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 3.69
33% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 4.41
8% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 152
Mixed 131
112% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.17
75% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 26.2
64% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.51
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
181GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 134
Write 154
Mixed 18.5
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
916GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 103
136% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 19.6
Mixed 17.6
26% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.93
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.42
40% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback