| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 months ago, 3 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170620 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 22:08 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 60% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Single core | Quad core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.7%
Very good
|
78% 97.7 Pts
|
78% 344 Pts
|
123% 819 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
17% 52.5 fps
|
19% 44 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
94.6%
Outstanding
|
85% 383 MB/s
|
140% 47 MB/s
|
81% 130 MB/s
|
|
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
84% 116 MB/s
|
74% 0.71 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$170
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
33.7%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
25% 8.7 GB/s
|
32% 125 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 12,338 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $105
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $170Bench 82%, 73,781 samples | 4,978x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $238Bench 85%, 49,123 samples | 2,457x |
| Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $200Bench 87%, 25,211 samples | 1,654x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 71%, 236,054 samples | 2,144x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $447Bench 100%, 282,479 samples | 1,178x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 39%, 131,721 samples | 1,173x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $834 |