| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5B-VM SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20090928 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 21:38 |
| Run Duration | 249 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
43.7%
Average
|
37% 52.2 Pts
|
13% 102 Pts
|
7% 119 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Dell(1028 0B0E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
7.47%
Terrible
|
8% 8.42 fps
|
7% 8.57 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
33% 152 MB/s
|
46% 19.9 MB/s
|
14% 30.8 MB/s
|
|
|
34.4%
Below average
|
35% 47.5 MB/s
|
93% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
|
6.69%
Terrible
|
17% 14.6 MB/s
|
32% 1.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
41% 98.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5B-VM SE Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5B-VM SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples | 1x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $129 |