Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 21:17
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3930K-$490
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
SC Int 115
SC Float 116
SC Mixed 116
92% 116 Pts
QC Int 449
QC Float 440
QC Mixed 444
101% 444 Pts
MC Int 827
MC Float 856
MC Mixed 864
127% 849 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti-$560
CLim: 1585 MHz, MLim: 1762 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
44% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
60% 143 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$290
236GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 476
Write 353
Mixed 376
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 17.3
75% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 51.6
DQ Mixed 18
20% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 119%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5900 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 124
Mixed 123
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.18
59% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 94%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64% Good
Read 105
Write 118
Mixed 106
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64%
Great: 77%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$137
221GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70% Good
Read 139
Write 105
Mixed 108
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.15
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 96%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$98
28GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 74.7
Write 91.6
Mixed 90.5
65% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/ CMT16GX3M4X21 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/ CMT16GX3M4X21 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/ CMT16GX3M4X21 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/ 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 28.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $357

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,497
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback