| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170901 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 21:05 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
77% 139 Pts
|
70% 573 Pts
|
57% 926 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
39% 49 fps
|
48% 59.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
93.4%
Outstanding
|
98% 442 MB/s
|
145% 51.2 MB/s
|
44% 82.3 MB/s
|
|
WD easystore 25FA 2TB
2TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
39% 31.2 MB/s
|
73% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
101% 35.4 GB/s
|
84% 29.5 GB/s
|
49% 81.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 100x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 88x |
| Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 75x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 52x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $1,061 |