Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140409
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 102 51% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 230 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.6 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 34.4 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3102 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1163 (A5) Unknown 100 100 365119865463 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 33 (A8) Unknown 100 100 21 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 95 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 44 188979609638 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3298555593472 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1780 (EA) Unknown 100 100 6482 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5204 (F2) Unknown 253 253 10123 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	72.4% Very good	Read 483 Write 311 Mixed 300 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 18.8 87% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 51.5 74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 356GB free Firmware: JC4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 112 (03) Spinup time 116 116 25789399342 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5690 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 37 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5659 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5693 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5693 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 197569282083 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5	31.8% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 47.5 Mixed 53.6 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.26 61% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 64%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 630GB free Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 140 (03) Spinup time 103 103 30089019765 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5564 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 131 131 29 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10919 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3606 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5578 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5578 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 201864183844 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18286	48.5% Average	Read 82.2 Write 86.5 Mixed 87.7 64% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.43 102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 9905403-439.A00LF 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16