Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N455 2,770 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.21% Terrible	Memory 9.27 1-Core 3.4 2-Core 4.9 4% 5.86 Pts	4-Core 7 8-Core 7.9 1% 7.45 Pts	64-Core 7.6 0% 7.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.21% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1059 (03) Spinup time 156 130 1175 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2089 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 408 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 395 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 1315 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 74 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16324 (C2) HDA temperature 113 93 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	37.3% Below average	Read 70.4 Write 59.6 Mixed 64.1 49% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.26 60% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.53% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.43 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 0.5 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 410 10% 410 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16