PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B09 |
Motherboard | MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds) |
Memory | 22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170906 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 03:06 |
Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
152%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZKW F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZKW 32GB
3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 123x |
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples | 43x |
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples | 37x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 38x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 19x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $753 |