Shuttle SX58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemShuttle SX58  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle SX58
Memory5.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 11 '17 at 19:42
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$79
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 140
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 359
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 75
52% 72.5 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 72.9
59% 72 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 97.1
Mixed 87
69% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 RMB2GB484CA5-13HC Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX58 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Shuttle SX58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback