Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 17:20
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 95.5 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 149 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 392 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 139 83% 110 fps	MRender 84.2 Gravity 95.5 Splatting 122 85% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 59GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1858 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 828 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2253501448	64.2% Good	Read 379 Write 193 Mixed 241 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 28.2 95% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 83 85% 142 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 134%
OCZ RevoDrive PCIe 240GB-$249 99 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3092965 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 21698174790659 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1365 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 750 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3092965 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3092965 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3092965 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4740 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3063 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3063 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4652	46.8% Average	Read 363 Write 178 Mixed 189 53% 243 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 10.1 69% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 51.7 DQ Mixed 10.3 15% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 83%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 14GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 198 195 3083 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2832 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13292 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1761 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 433 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2870 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 185 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 185 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 1 0	57.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 99.5 Mixed 78.7 69% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.71 164% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 23.5 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16