Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090805
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 13:53
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 46.2 2-Core 91.7 48% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 168 20% 157 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 3,739 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.84 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.59% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 3.31 5% 5.16 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 3.87 4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.59% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 52GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14300 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2825 (B1) Unknown 94 94 214 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 85 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19038053315	39.1% Below average	Read 257 Write 216 Mixed 244 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 8.53 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 11.1 37% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 66.5 DQ Mixed 51.7 50% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7872 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1371 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16134180657	41.1% Average	Read 261 Write 192 Mixed 206 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 12.1 44% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 70.4 66% 103 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 237GB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 87 (03) Spinup time 125 125 21493055766 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 388 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 388 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 409 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 409 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 176094642210 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.6% Average	Read 78.8 Write 80.1 Mixed 80.2 60% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.19 64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 77GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169897 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5161 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13780 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2627 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5168 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5168 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 193274511394 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.1% Very good	Read 131 Write 124 Mixed 152 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 108%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB 3,366 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 10GB free Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 98756480 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 866 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15223579 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5305 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 866 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 53 53 47 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 521142303 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 866 (C2) HDA temperature 31 41 55834574879 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	8.26% Terrible	Read 11.6 Write 16.7 Mixed 12.9 10% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.1 51% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 11.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA790XT-UD4P Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
R5SL120G 120GBBench 62%, 596 samples	3x
BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GBSeagateBench 151%, 3,172 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	18x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16