| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Alienware Aurora R7 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware 0VDT73 |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171006 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 10 '17 at 07:07 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
52% 83.7 Pts
|
36% 297 Pts
|
28% 444 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.4%
Excellent
|
71% 130 fps
|
113% 139 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
181%
Outstanding
|
338% 1,534 MB/s
|
91% 29.5 MB/s
|
84% 141 MB/s
|
|
|
97.8%
Outstanding
|
127% 168 MB/s
|
85% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
36.3%
Below average
|
110% 85.5 MB/s
|
61% 0.75 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
62.5%
Good
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
49% 81.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,181 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Aurora R7
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 2,852x |
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,385x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 771x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1,295x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,039x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 663x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $633 |