Asus CM6850

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CM6850  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6850
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 05:02
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 146
58% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 366
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
XFX(1682 3248) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Lighting 9.17
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.7
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 9
Splatting 9
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.23%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 496
Write 275
Mixed 265
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 9.82
66% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 39.2
27% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
24GB free
Firmware: R112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 508
Write 151
Mixed 222
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 12.2
88% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 47
46% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
1GB free
Firmware: GN003J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 50.7
Mixed 51.3
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.13
53% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback