Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 759 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 63 2-Core 126 54% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 251 34% 251 Pts	64-Core 250 15% 250 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 6.31 6% 7.59 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.39 7% 8.71 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 511GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4C07 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 98.7 Mixed 97.5 74% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.43 98% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 62%
Innostor Innostor 32GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 17GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	6.89% Terrible	Read 23 Write 8.71 Mixed 1.72 11% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.06 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.23 30% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.89% Great: 29%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 7GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 8.32 Mixed 9.65 14% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.25 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 1.14 63% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 17.3 Mixed 6.94 18% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.24 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 63% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.1% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 23.6 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16